<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet debate round-up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog//internet-debate-round-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/internet-debate-round-up/</link>
	<description>Thought and news on e-democracy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Give us your ideas for panelists @ Delib&#8217;s next debate &#124; Delib Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/internet-debate-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1383</link>
		<dc:creator>Give us your ideas for panelists @ Delib&#8217;s next debate &#124; Delib Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/internet-debate-round-up/#comment-1383</guid>
		<description>[...] the great success of our last debate event back in July, we&#8217;re holding a new debate in Parliament in January (18th)  &#8211; kindly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the great success of our last debate event back in July, we&#8217;re holding a new debate in Parliament in January (18th)  &#8211; kindly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet and democracy debate - 15 minute edit &#124; Delib Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/internet-debate-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet and democracy debate - 15 minute edit &#124; Delib Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/internet-debate-round-up/#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>[...] we&#8217;ve finally got our 15 minute edit of the Internet and democracy debate we ran earlier in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we&#8217;ve finally got our 15 minute edit of the Internet and democracy debate we ran earlier in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Gee</title>
		<link>http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/internet-debate-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1133</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Gee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/internet-debate-round-up/#comment-1133</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a More4 / Reboot Britain event in similar territory tonight in the Houses of Parliament around a screening of Ivo Gormley&#039;s film &#039;Us Now&#039; (which is being Broadcast on More 4 this Friday night 10th July). We&#039;ll try to pick up on some of the loose ends above and we&#039;ll use #usnow if you want to follow from afar. 
http://usnowparliament.eventbrite.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a More4 / Reboot Britain event in similar territory tonight in the Houses of Parliament around a screening of Ivo Gormley&#8217;s film &#8216;Us Now&#8217; (which is being Broadcast on More 4 this Friday night 10th July). We&#8217;ll try to pick up on some of the loose ends above and we&#8217;ll use #usnow if you want to follow from afar.<br />
<a href="http://usnowparliament.eventbrite.com/" rel="nofollow">http://usnowparliament.eventbrite.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Shapps &#8211; Is the internet the saviour or corruptor of democracy? &#124; 24 Plus News - Politics &#38; Financial</title>
		<link>http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/internet-debate-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Shapps &#8211; Is the internet the saviour or corruptor of democracy? &#124; 24 Plus News - Politics &#38; Financial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/internet-debate-round-up/#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>[...] Last night I was the only politician on a panel at a Henry Jackson Society debate The Internet: Saviour or Corruptor of Democracy? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last night I was the only politician on a panel at a Henry Jackson Society debate The Internet: Saviour or Corruptor of Democracy? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/internet-debate-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1111</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/internet-debate-round-up/#comment-1111</guid>
		<description>Thanks for organising this - I&#039;m looking forward to the podcast when it&#039;s available. And thanks for allowing Twitter participation - that was great. A shame some people used that just to be sweary, stupid and so on. I&#039;ve no idea if anything can be done about that. 

A point about Twitter questions, though. You&#039;ll think I&#039;m a mad, raging angry punter because I&#039;ve raised this a few times: but I&#039;m not. I just keep going on about it because your replies to me on Twitter so far make it look as though you&#039;ve not &quot;got&quot; my point. 

You invited Twitter questions; I and no doubt other sent them in; the end of the debate you asked for any final Twitter questions; later you apologised to people for not being able to ask the questions and tweeted me that you didn&#039;t get close to asking them all. So I know (1) that you had a big list of unasked questions including mine (2) that at the end of the debate you still thought you might have time to ask a Twitter question or two but (3) that you felt you needed more Twitter questions. 

Can you see how that makes me feel my question was somehow not good enough, if you needed more? 

I think the way to avoid people getting the feeling their question has been rejected is just to say upfront that you&#039;ll pick questions you like! If you have an idea of the subjects you&#039;d like covered (I got the impression you wanted to steer the debate away from blogging towards campaigning, other types of web-democracy etc.) then just say so!

Explaining after the fact by saying there wasn&#039;t enough time left me feeling you weren&#039;t being straight - your asking for more questions shows is wasn&#039;t about time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for organising this &#8211; I&#8217;m looking forward to the podcast when it&#8217;s available. And thanks for allowing Twitter participation &#8211; that was great. A shame some people used that just to be sweary, stupid and so on. I&#8217;ve no idea if anything can be done about that. </p>
<p>A point about Twitter questions, though. You&#8217;ll think I&#8217;m a mad, raging angry punter because I&#8217;ve raised this a few times: but I&#8217;m not. I just keep going on about it because your replies to me on Twitter so far make it look as though you&#8217;ve not &#8220;got&#8221; my point. </p>
<p>You invited Twitter questions; I and no doubt other sent them in; the end of the debate you asked for any final Twitter questions; later you apologised to people for not being able to ask the questions and tweeted me that you didn&#8217;t get close to asking them all. So I know (1) that you had a big list of unasked questions including mine (2) that at the end of the debate you still thought you might have time to ask a Twitter question or two but (3) that you felt you needed more Twitter questions. </p>
<p>Can you see how that makes me feel my question was somehow not good enough, if you needed more? </p>
<p>I think the way to avoid people getting the feeling their question has been rejected is just to say upfront that you&#8217;ll pick questions you like! If you have an idea of the subjects you&#8217;d like covered (I got the impression you wanted to steer the debate away from blogging towards campaigning, other types of web-democracy etc.) then just say so!</p>
<p>Explaining after the fact by saying there wasn&#8217;t enough time left me feeling you weren&#8217;t being straight &#8211; your asking for more questions shows is wasn&#8217;t about time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IanVisits &#187; The Internet: Saviour or Corruptor of Democracy?</title>
		<link>http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/internet-debate-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1108</link>
		<dc:creator>IanVisits &#187; The Internet: Saviour or Corruptor of Democracy?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/internet-debate-round-up/#comment-1108</guid>
		<description>[...] and to co-organiser, DelibConsults. Some other bloggers who were there include, the aforementioned Delib, ToryBear and Guido Fawkes. Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and to co-organiser, DelibConsults. Some other bloggers who were there include, the aforementioned Delib, ToryBear and Guido Fawkes. Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by cbstalk</title>
		<link>http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/internet-debate-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1107</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by cbstalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/internet-debate-round-up/#comment-1107</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by cbstalk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by cbstalk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
