<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here come the tube-steppers</title>
	<link>http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/here-come-the-tube-steppers/</link>
	<description>Thought and news on e-democracy</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ChrisQ</title>
		<link>http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/here-come-the-tube-steppers/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/here-come-the-tube-steppers/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Cool - thanks for this Paul.  We found the same Yahoo thing + blogged about it on our Citizen Space blog a while back
http://www.citizenspace.com/citizenspace/?p=37

We're planning to launch a new permanent Opinion Tracker monitoring the 3 main parties soon, so this should provide better ongoing data to show any correlations that surface . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool - thanks for this Paul.  We found the same Yahoo thing + blogged about it on our Citizen Space blog a while back<br />
<a href="http://www.citizenspace.com/citizenspace/?p=37" rel="nofollow">http://www.citizenspace.com/citizenspace/?p=37</a></p>
<p>We&#8217;re planning to launch a new permanent Opinion Tracker monitoring the 3 main parties soon, so this should provide better ongoing data to show any correlations that surface . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul canning</title>
		<link>http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/here-come-the-tube-steppers/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>paul canning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.delib.co.uk/dblog/here-come-the-tube-steppers/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>there was some work tying online buzz to outcomes in the US primaries. yahoo were pushing it from memory - techpresident would have it.

it's obviously not an exact science but there's also definitely something in it if you look more at trends that exact comparisons I think.

another good US tool is one which creates clouds of terms in blog posts - the one I've seen parses 'leftleaning' and 'roght-leaning' blogs, which would break up here of course because where would you put the libdems.

found an example I posted
http://paulcanning.blogspot.com/2008/03/postscript-obama-addresses-race-hear.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there was some work tying online buzz to outcomes in the US primaries. yahoo were pushing it from memory - techpresident would have it.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s obviously not an exact science but there&#8217;s also definitely something in it if you look more at trends that exact comparisons I think.</p>
<p>another good US tool is one which creates clouds of terms in blog posts - the one I&#8217;ve seen parses &#8216;leftleaning&#8217; and &#8216;roght-leaning&#8217; blogs, which would break up here of course because where would you put the libdems.</p>
<p>found an example I posted<br />
<a href="http://paulcanning.blogspot.com/2008/03/postscript-obama-addresses-race-hear.html" rel="nofollow">http://paulcanning.blogspot.com/2008/03/postscript-obama-addresses-race-hear.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
